No, it’s really not. Thus the 6000 remaining employees.
(Assuming this is a significant part of their business)
Comment on Block ditches 4,000 staff, because AI can do their jobs
Powderhorn@beehaw.org 3 weeks agoBecause 90% accuracy is acceptable for financial institutions …
No, it’s really not. Thus the 6000 remaining employees.
(Assuming this is a significant part of their business)
XLE@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
I’ve got an idea. If 90% of AI’s output is accurate, just have humans review the 10% that will be inaccurate.
(Yes I am an AI expert, how did you know)
TehPers@beehaw.org 2 weeks ago
Which outputs are accurate, and which ones are inaccurate? How could you tell? What steps did you take to verify accuracy? Was verifying it a manual process?
XLE@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
That’s easy. You just get a second AI to ask the first AI if their responses were accurate or not
(/s)
TehPers@beehaw.org 2 weeks ago
This is unironically what I’ve seen people try to do, except they assume the second AI is correct.
Unrelated, but this is how GANs work to some extent. GANs train during the back-and-forth though, while LLMs do not.