I mean, the part you cited already mentioned it but later in the study its stated even more clearly:
Across all studies, there was no evidence to support a causal relation between the consumption or avoidance of meat and any psychological outcomes.
Comment on "Being vegan is unnatural"
ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 2 weeks agoNot only that, but also vegan died is literally making people crazy (or crazy people are more often on vegan diet, dealer’s choice).
Source: www.tandfonline.com/doi/…/10408398.2020.1741505#a…
The majority of studies, and especially the higher quality studies, showed that those who avoided meat consumption had significantly higher rates or risk of depression, anxiety, and/or self-harm behaviors. There was mixed evidence for temporal relations, but study designs and a lack of rigor precluded inferences of causal relations. Our study does not support meat avoidance as a strategy to benefit psychological health.
I mean, the part you cited already mentioned it but later in the study its stated even more clearly:
Across all studies, there was no evidence to support a causal relation between the consumption or avoidance of meat and any psychological outcomes.
A sentence later it says
These authors posited that mental disorders may lead to the adoption of a meat-less diet. The authors stated that individuals with mental disorders may “choose a vegetarian diet as a form of safety or self-protective behavior”
And I wrote
or crazy people are more often on vegan diet, dealer’s choice
You wrote
vegan diet is literally making people crazy
You were wrong about that, just walk it back dude, it’s not a big deal, it’s okay to be wrong about things.
Also, people with anxiety and depression aren’t widely considered to be “crazy”.
Reading comprehension my dude. I wrote A or B, study says A or B.
vegan diet is literally making people crazy
Wrong.
(or crazy people are more often on vegan diet, dealer’s choice).
Mmm, no, there is a right answer and it’s this one. Well, it’s this one with more inclusive language. Like “People who have experienced more hardship with psychological consequences are more likely to avoid consumption of animal products”.
People who have experienced more hardship
Doesn’t match the data. Study and raw data say nothing about the hardships.
This fella doesn’t know mental illnesses are caused by hardship and trauma
Can be caused my dude.
lemonwood@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
This is a metastudy not an original study though?
(And this is a shitpost community)
lemonwood@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
It means this metastudy is less of a study and more of an advertisement. The outcome of a metastudy depends even more on who does it, especially if they make up the criteria for which research is “good” enough to include.