Comment on misleading cover
Emotional_Series7814@piefed.zip 4 hours agoThe question is where do you draw the line? I’m sure that in Victorian times, something like sex with the lights on or anything not heterosexual is
the honestly disgusting and insane things that get published
and
literary depravity
I think a better question is how do we prevent people from getting hurt in real life, not what do you personally find disgusting. I personally cannot watch horror, pimple-popping, even had to look away during some action movies because I think injuries are disgusting, but I don’t argue for these things that will live rent-free in my head in a negative way to stop existing for everyone. I just don’t consume it, and ask people to tag content appropriately if I see it untagged. But of course, if you injure a person in real life and not just on film or a book, then by all means throw the book at them and stop the depraved insanity.
ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
It’s brain poison, and you can waste your time with things that are not nearly as depraved. Stop your perspectivism, at some point these things are just morally wrong and shouldn’t be published (any literature that praises/paints in a good light things like rape, assault, abuse, etc just because it makes people wet). Do I think it’s a big thing overall? No, because this is porn for women and women aren’t outside murdering and raping, that’s almost entirely the domain of men. I do think that, especially for those that come from an amoral, postmodern culture and that never knew what it’s like to have a proper male role model, or what male love should be like because their fathers either weren’t at home or were confused and amoral, it can be somewhat dangerous.
Emotional_Series7814@piefed.zip 4 hours ago
I am just going to agree to disagree with you here.
ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
That’s cordial of you, I appreciate it.