Comment on Whoever come up with this monstrosity has to get a personal extra hot cauldron in hell

• TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Fine. The solution is downloading everything instead, which is faster anyway

  source

  • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Arguable. Internet around my are is fucking nuts on price. To save some coin, I am stuck with 100mbps. 30gb Bluray movie would take me approx 2.5h while MakeMKV would rip a disc in 50 minutes.

    source

    • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Wow! Ok I get it. I have 5gb/s unlimited for 45 euros/month. With usenet I can download a 40GB movie in an hour (max server speed) if I wanted to. The issue I have is storage. I only have 4TB free on my 36TB NAS so I need to download lower quality (usually ~10GB per movie, 1-3GB pr episode) until I have saved enough money for a bigger NAS.

      source
  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    True for content that is available this way, and if you have a flatrate broadband connection.

    source

    • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Recently I have been able to download a Dutch TV series from 1969 for which I had multiple quality options. Unless it’s a home made video or something, I can’t imagine anything that isn’t available. But why use cases like that

      source