With RickyRigatoni’s idea, it wouldn’t be a videogame. It would be a separate program you launch specifically to order things online. It just happens to use a game engine for its implementation, because game engines are the most advanced simulation tool humanity has developed…
Comment on Unity launches Walmart SDK to "seamlessly integrate products" into games
Euphoma@lemmy.ml 1 day agoThe concept of buying real items inside a videogame has never made sense to me.
Ephera@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
definitemaybe@lemmy.ca 5 hours ago
I could see it for some things. It would be great for browsing 3D print models or furniture—items where the shape/size matter a lot.
Like, an IKEA app that uses AR passthrough to show furniture options in your space? That’d be really cool, if it could be trusted not to spy on you.
Or an interior design app, that gave you a variety of options it pulls from a variety of sources, and you could add items to your cart right from the app?
For 3D prints, it would be great to have a virtual storefront of models to see, pick up, rotate, etc. 3D print .STL files are shockingly large (often 100MB+ for a single model), so idk if it’s realistic, but it would be a great use case if it was feasible. (My current special interest is showing…)
dev_null@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
A high quality VR store where I can actually physically browse the isles would be superior to trying to browse a 2D website. And being able to pick up a product, with a realistic 3D model, look at it from any angle and visually compare packaging sizes across brands - like I can in a real store but can’t on a website - would be nice.
I can’t tell you how many times I accidentally ordered a too small or too big version of something, because product photos on websites are always the same size (just fill the frame).
Ephera@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
One time, I got delivered teaspoons instead of spoons, because I couldn’t tell the difference from the picture (and the description did not bother mentionuing that at all).
Another time, I got delivered light bulbs the size of a toddler’s head, because the manufacturer decided to use a picture of a regular-size bulb. Well, and in the online store, the size only got mentioned as actual width/height values in the details.
But yeah, we do already have the technology to place a banana next to your product, and to take photos from all angles. Manufacturers and stores just don’t see enough of a benefit from actually doing that, so have a singular picture in a white void, which shows a different product. You’re welcome! 👍