Comment on Poor Jeremy
Lauchmelder@feddit.org 1 day agoI don’t believe crowds are inherently trustworthy or right. I can still question whether content belongs here or not, despite the crowd
Comment on Poor Jeremy
Lauchmelder@feddit.org 1 day agoI don’t believe crowds are inherently trustworthy or right. I can still question whether content belongs here or not, despite the crowd
ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 1 day ago
That’s how democracy works. If there’s enough offended purists like you, go create c/truesciencememes
Lauchmelder@feddit.org 1 day ago
Sir this isn’t a democracy, this is a moderated community
ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 1 day ago
True but people’s votes are the judicial branch that interprets the rules. They can choose to make another community when the dictator makes bad executive or legislative decisions (see !196@lemmy.blahaj.zone vs !onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone). As I said, you’re free to create a rival community and if your views prevail, it can get big (especially if !sciencememes@mander.xyz ever suffers a crisis like having to change instances).
Magnum@infosec.pub 1 day ago
Ein simpler Mann sieht Lauch und wählt hoch
ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 14 hours ago
Auch bei legendären Beiträgern wie ZonenRanslite lese ich zuerst den Inhalt