Comment on Metal Exclusionary Radical Astronomy

• davidagain@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I understand that you’re unable to use your definition to untangle the real chart. It’s OK, I knew that you wouldn’t be able to, and I also knew that you wouldn’t be able to admit that you can’t, because I also know that you want to win more than you want to be right. You’re quite happy to be wrong as long as you’re winning.

  One day you may realise that truth and people are more important than winning, but that day is definitely not going to be today, and definitely won’t be written about using the powerstruggle account. Do you think that Charlie kirk realised that his loyalty to winning arguments was misplaced as he was dying, or do you think he died happy for a cause he believed in - the right to bear arms no matter the consequences?

  source

  • powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Do you understand that those charts don’t each represent a different sex?

    source

    • davidagain@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I understand that using reason, logic, truth and sense to debate with you was a waste of time and that we continue to disagree about sex. You claim there are only two sexes yet you are unable to demonstrate that on the real chart and you are unable to see that your eleven charts would be tangled up if you drew them as one diagram with one node each for each set of chromosomes, but there I go, talking logic to a bigoted troll who wouldn’t admit they were wrong under any circumstances whatsoever, because truth matters to them less than “winning”.

      Did you own the libs again, powerstruggle? Did all the little red downvotes on the rest of the conversation prove you were winning your little war against the libs?

      source

      • powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Do you understand that those charts don’t each represent a different sex?

        source

        • -> View More Comments