Comment on Metal Exclusionary Radical Astronomy

<- View Parent
powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

My apologies, I didn’t think I needed to spell it out this simply. I gave one example of how people with that condition are unambiguously sexed, and asked if you were confused on the others.

There’s no getting around the fact that it’s a bad chart, but somebody conveniently has already made better ones. I’ll copy them here, in order that they appear in the colored line in the chart. Here’s the first one that explains what each box means:

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

(Mixed gondal dysgenesis, as discussed above, this isn’t a single condition, it’s an umbrella term)

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Note the sex listed on each chart. None of them are unambiguous. Before you start inevitably complaining about the chart, why did you trust the first chart? Simply because it agreed with you?

Stop and consider before you respond: do you have any substantial critiques of these charts? Or are you just going to find some irrelevant detail and obsess about that? That’s called trolling, and you certainly wouldn’t want to do that, right? You’ll respond in good faith, yes?

source
Sort:hotnewtop