Comment on Metal Exclusionary Radical Astronomy
a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 4 days agoDude, in your first couple of posts you only managed to cite yourself. XD Peer review my ass. XD
This is not a serious conversation.
Comment on Metal Exclusionary Radical Astronomy
a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 4 days agoDude, in your first couple of posts you only managed to cite yourself. XD Peer review my ass. XD
This is not a serious conversation.
powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
Sigh. I linked to a comment I had previously made, which links to the author of Sex Redefined (peer-reviewed paper) clarifying that there are two sexes, and quote her inline for easy reading.
You’re right that I don’t link to the paper there, but it’s in the grandparent comment. Hit the “Show Context” button to get the link. Just so you can’t evade again, here’s the link:
www.nature.com/articles/518288a
That’s a peer-reviewed paper published in Nature by a PhD Developmental Biology. When asked to clarify, She directly stated that the papers claims there are two sexes.
You have no excuse to not engage with it. Stop acting in bad faith.
a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Look, I’m just finding it more productive to continue making fun of you. You just make it so easy. XD
powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
Right, so you’re refusing to engage with peer-reviewed sources.
a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Oh, man, I have bad news.
I wasn’t even taking you terribly seriously yesterday and it’s been like 12 hours since then. XD