Comment

Comment on Metal Exclusionary Radical Astronomy

in non-gamete-producing cases, experts would look at determination mechanisms to figure out the likely sex those experts might be wrong

That’s an awful lot of words about trump’s definitions before you admit that some people have scientifically unknowable sex even with your supposedly binary definition. And that’s even before I put ten people I know in a room with you and you’re unable to use your definition in your own terms on them, not even if you check what’s in their pants.

Even of you were right, (which only you believe), it’s irrelevant to actual people’s lives. Stop trolling trans posts.

source

Sort:hotnew top

powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
It’s not unknowable, you’re just being intentionally obtuse. It’s knowable with better science, it’s just possible that an expert is wrong. If they’re wrong, that doesn’t change reality.

Someone’s sex exists regardless of my ability to discern it. Your example is bad faith trolling.

If it’s irrelevant then just ignore it. You can’t handle the truth and so you troll and try to derail and accuse and insult.

source
- davidagain@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  sex exists regardless of my ability to discern it
  
  Yes, your abject uselessness at that shines through most things you say. At last something we can agree on.
  
  So having complained about me calling it unknowable, you admit that it’s undiscernable (which is of course completely different /s), we come back to the irrelevance of everything you said to everyday life.
  
  source
  - powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    Again, not undiscernable. Are you able to understand that?
    
    source
    davidagain@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    I love that you admit that you can’t do it and even that the greatest experts mightn’t be able to do it but yet still believe it’s a useful definition! It’s a useless and crap definition! Actually useless! Complete crap!
    
    Chromosomes are testable. Verifyable. Take a blood sample, some time in the lab and it’s done! This is why scientists use them to define sex. Your definition is untestable! It’s not science. It’s pseudoscience. It sounds plausible because it uses technical terms, and stupid people believe it because it sounds clever. But because you believed trump, who is famously very stupid, you have believed a stupid thing, and you can’t stop talking about it, in public!
    
    If I found out that trump had duped me into believing some pseudoscience, I would be ASHAMED. You, not so much.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments