Comment on Metal Exclusionary Radical Astronomy

<- View Parent
powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

The author of that paper has a PhD in evolutionary biology and is well-qualified to talk about it, but also provides plenty of citations in the paper. His point is simply that trying to redefine sex in that way leads to a circular definition that isn’t useful.

To that point, what does “male gametes but with a female phenotype” mean? What does female mean? How can you define it without reference to gametes?

source
Sort:hotnewtop