Right, but you have to define what “observation” means when you’re talking about things that small.
Comment on Let's stick with just the one observer from now on, then
gegil@sopuli.xyz 10 months agoI think the point of this exepirement is not to observe an electron to see its path, but the fact of obversion itself. Because without obsevation it takes both paths.
null@piefed.nullspace.lol 10 months ago
exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
I was hoping that by observing your comment these would collapse into the spelling “observation.”
gegil@sopuli.xyz 10 months ago
Obsevation is just a typo, but wtf is obversion?