Right, but you have to define what “observation” means when you’re talking about things that small.
Comment on Let's stick with just the one observer from now on, then
gegil@sopuli.xyz 1 day agoI think the point of this exepirement is not to observe an electron to see its path, but the fact of obversion itself. Because without obsevation it takes both paths.
null@piefed.nullspace.lol 1 day ago
exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
I was hoping that by observing your comment these would collapse into the spelling “observation.”
gegil@sopuli.xyz 1 day ago
Obsevation is just a typo, but wtf is obversion?