how would this work in your utopia?
Like it did in the US in the 1930-60s. Not gonna reinvent something that has proven useful and effective enough to create a superpower.
Seems difficult to raise capital that way.
Something something banks?
Would you put more large cap projects in the hands of a government? Things like power plants, large buildings, etc?
Power plants are a perfect example of infrastructure that need to be national and not private in order to be technically and financially efficient. Running them for profit either means you end up overlooking safety for profit (see David Besse) or hiking the selling price which is detrimental to both your industry and population.
Large buildings are just not on the same financial scale or are just uselessly tall.
t3rmit3@beehaw.org 5 weeks ago
Privately owned power plants aren’t built and owned by individuals. Ditto for 99% of large buildings. And we can do without the personal skyscrapers, yes.
locuester@lemmy.zip 5 weeks ago
I was referring to the company net worth that was mentioned.
The quote was related to my question.
t3rmit3@beehaw.org 5 weeks ago
You quoted the wrong part, then. The company cap that Phoenixz proposed was $1 billion, not $10-20 million. Companies can easily build large-scale projects with a billion, and projects that are going to run over that should probably be weighed against public interest and publicly-funded and managed, if they’re beneficial.
locuester@lemmy.zip 5 weeks ago
Like I said, the quote was related to my first paragraph asking the question about personal net worth.
I didn’t then quote the company part as I thought the flow continued logically. It seems I was wrong.
I’m aware of the cap he said, and that’s what I was asking an opinion on.
Thank you for contributing yours.
So large skyscrapers, large nuclear plants, datacenters, etc would be state owned.
If we did that, I’d argue to make the limit even smaller. It would encourage companies to stay small and that would help prevent monopolies perhaps.