Yeah, that was the part that got me. That makes it seem really scummy even of there is some kind of genuine explanation for this.
Silverseren@kbin.social 7 months ago
Funny enough, I think the most blatant and consequential example of this not being able to be taken in good faith is the use of the quote from the UCSF person on the charity website. A person who was fired for money problems 7 years before the charity existed.
No matter what explanation they can give for why they have a quote from him thanking them for donating to UCSF, I see no way for the explanation to be good.
stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 7 months ago
108@kbin.social 7 months ago
Wonder what happened to all the interest it had built up
BustinJiber@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Well, since they did not donate anything they couldn’t get a quote from anybody they donated to, that would be legitimate.
I don’t know what was their endgame? It’s been going on since 2014, how could they not think this would have come out eventually.