Comment

Comment on "Does Hitler have a right to privacy?" and other big questions in research ethics.

Phineaz@feddit.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

I think that’s an easy one: Hitler is dead and, as far as I know, never had any direct descendants or relatives that could object on valid reasons.

Sort:hotnew top

thessnake03@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
Hitler’s (half?) nephew served in the US Navy during WW2. I don’t think William has any remaining kin though.

Corpsman Hitler, U.S. Navy? - Lyon Air Museum share.google/EyrJMOCp1ocHntkl7

source
- Beacon@fedia.io ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  A niece or nephew isn't a direct descendant
  
  source
apotheotic@beehaw.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
Why should doing experiments on ones bodily components be an opt-out situation?

source
- Phineaz@feddit.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  Whether it be an opt-out or -in situation is beyond the topic of this question, but neither are applicable here.
  
  source
  - apotheotic@beehaw.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    There is nobody who has consented or is still able to consent to any experiments being conducted on his remains. Dudes a fucking disgusting stain on the canvas of humanity. Doesn’t mean consent is void. Opt-out, in my original reply, was pointing to the fact you think that “the absence of a voice against consent” is effectively consenting.
    
    source