Comment on The existence of billionaires is a policy failure

dreary8154@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

• Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Half the innovation and tech you use today is because of development by research councils that are government funded, military tech (government funded) or open source projects that were forked in some way shape or form.

  source

  • dreary8154@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Developed by private players not government, if you give civil servants the money they will burn it up.

    source

    • Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Hahahahahahaha Jesus christ

      source

      • dreary8154@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Wow god you are special.

        source
• prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Can you explain to me, in your own words, what you believe a “commie” is?

  source

  • dreary8154@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Belief that government can do better or some rich people innovating is a bad thing.

    source

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Right. Try reading a book.

      source

      • dreary8154@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Said the commie

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• balsoft@lemmy.ml ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Leftists are the first to laud innovation when it benefits regular people. This is just a dick measuring contest by some asshats, financed by stealing billions of dollars from their workers.

  source

  • masterspace@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    You do realize that NASA has a fixed budget for the science missions they can run right? A d you do realize that when the launch costs for their satellites are 50x lower, that means they can run more missions more often?

    We all hate Musk, but it’s fucking insane to look at the equivalent of the first airplane company that could land a plane and didn’t just destroy it after every flight, and say ‘thats just a dick measuring contest, how could that be useful?’

    source

    • balsoft@lemmy.ml ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Capitalism can create innovation, but capitalism is not necessary for it. The very same innovation could have happened if the state spent a fraction of this money on R&D, without all the insane Terraform Mars T-shirts and 3 companies wasting resources to do pretty much exactly the same thing three times.

      source

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Capitalism can create innovation, but capitalism is not necessary for it. The very same innovation could have happened if the state spent a fraction of this money on R&D, without all the insane Terraform Mars T-shirts and 3 companies wasting resources to do pretty much exactly the same thing three times. Sadly the american government is not an effective redistributor of wealth, and any NASA budget comes with a million (dumb) strings attached, like spending it on certain projects that benefit the state senator who voted for it.

        In this situation, the state LITERALLY spent more money developing the SLS rocket, and it is going to be a colossal failure and waste of money compared to the rockets that can be reused.

        Three companies trying to produce the same thing is not a waste, it’s literally the defining feature of capitalism and why every government, including the Chinese Communist government, still uses capitalist systems. Multiple entities competing to do the same thing gives you more variety and diversity, and hedges your bets in case one of them is wrong or corrupted by flawed people in it.

        Also, I don’t know where you get that 50x number, SpaceX lowered the launch cost maybe by about 3-4x compared to contemporary chinese rockets.

        Compared to SLS, the literal state funded alternative.

        source

        • -> View More Comments