Comment on When "AI" content becomes indistinguishable from human-made content, is there, philosophically speaking, any meaningful differences between the two?
Nemo@slrpnk.net 1 month ago
Yes. I’d rather pay a person to make art than a corporation.
AI tools can be trained and run locally by individuals, not just by corporations.
Does an AI exist that uses no copyrighted products for its training?
Does that matter? There have been several major court cases at this point that have established that training an AI is fair use.
Because it mean the product you are getting is just someone else’s stolen work. Courts have said lots of things are legal that are unethical. When you ask an AI to make art it just is stealing that from other people’s art
FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 month ago
AI tools can be trained and run locally by individuals, not just by corporations.
BussyCat@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Does an AI exist that uses no copyrighted products for its training?
FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 month ago
Does that matter? There have been several major court cases at this point that have established that training an AI is fair use.
BussyCat@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Because it mean the product you are getting is just someone else’s stolen work. Courts have said lots of things are legal that are unethical. When you ask an AI to make art it just is stealing that from other people’s art