I’m not sure why you’re arguing. YOU linked to the article I responded to. Did you actually read it? And did you notice that the article now redirects to a different article than the one you linked to?
It really wasn’t hard to find a different source that for the same article you ooriginally posted. Many other sites reposted.
I’m not sure why you’re arguing. YOU linked to the article I responded to. Did you actually read it?
sffgazette.com/…/star-trek-4-has-finally-been-scr… Note: “SOURCE: VARIETY”
Kirk@startrek.website 1 day ago
The article I shared is the original source and does not contain a mention of prequels.
The link you shared just now appears to be an AI slop summary with added hallucinations.
I am arguing with you because from the perspective of someone reading the article I shared, you brought up an entirely unrelated topic in order to complain.
ragepaw@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
The title of the article you posted is clearly not the same article given that it’s not the same headline or the fact it’s not even about Star Trek.
You’re clearly a troll, and I’m done wasting time with you.
Kirk@startrek.website 1 day ago
The article that you are commenting on is the original source for quote and does not contain any mention of prequels.