Comment on [RANT] Why is so much coverage of "AI" devoted to this belief that we've never had automation before (and that management even really wants it)?

• TehPers@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Yep! You would need not only an AI superintelligence capable of reflecting and adapting, but legislation which holds liable those superintelligences and grants them the rights and obligations of a human. Because there is no concept of reward of punishment to a LLM, they can never be replacements for people.

  source

  • lvxferre@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    It’s more than that: they’d need to have desires, aversions, goals. That is not automatically granted by intelligence; in our case it’s from our instincts as animals. So perhaps you’d need to actually evolve Darwin style the AGI systems you develop, and that would be way more massive than a single AGI, let alone the “put glue on pizza lol” systems we’re frying the planet for.

    source
  • Powderhorn@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    I mean, corporations are people. How is this less reasonable?

    source

    • TehPers@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      It’s not really (which says more about corporations than anything).

      source

      • Powderhorn@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        I’m reminded of the fairy tale of the two squirrels in the Black Forest. As fall came to pass, they BALLROOM!

        source