Comment on OpenAI be like
dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 5 days agoI really appreciate that! I was asking more for the information of it, I doubt I could do anything with the link. Lol. I don’t understand thing 1 about this stuff. I don’t even know wtf a weight is in this context lol
edinbruh@feddit.it 5 days ago
In this context “weight” is a mathematical term. Have you ever heard the term “weighted average”? Basically it means calculating an average where some elements are more “influent/important” than others, the number that indicates the importance of an element is called a weight.
One oversimplification of how any neural network work could be this:
Training an AI means finding the weights that give the best results, and thus, for an AI to be open-source, we need both the weights and the training code that generated them.
Personally, I feel that we should also have the original training data itself to call it open source, not just weights and code.
MrMcGasion@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Absolutely agree that to be called open source the training data should also be open. It would also pretty much mean that true open source models would be ethically trained.
Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca 4 days ago
What does the open source training data include? I’ve read a few open source training data that is also tested for biased but I haven’t really looked at them.
dovah@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Yeah, good call. Training data should be available as well.
dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 5 days ago
Thank you!
And yeah, it really does seem like the training data should be open. Like, not even just to be considered open source, just to be allowed to do this at all, ethically, the training data should be known, at least to some degree. Like, there’s so much shit out there, knowing what they trained on would help make some kind of ethical choice in using it