Comment

Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

Ok but has this actually been proposed by an archeologist in accordance with the evidence we have? Is this a possible recreation or has it in effect already been disproven with what we know?

There’s a big difference between “in 2024 an archeologist asked an artist to paint this” and “someone on ticktock ai generated this”.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Derpenheim@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
Well, its literally signed by the author for starters, and this is a very common thing in paleo-art. ESPECIALLY with something as controversial as spinosaurus. What spinosaurus looked like and how it behaved has been the subject of intense debate and multiple revisions over the last 2 decades.

source
- Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  There is also an unreadable (due to compression) watermark under to it, how would I know it is actually an artists signature?
  I assume then it is, and of an artist you recognize to be credible?
  
  source