Comment on 22 months later
Lumidaub@feddit.org 18 hours agoIt’s about not giving your opponent any ammunition to discredit your argument.
Comment on 22 months later
Lumidaub@feddit.org 18 hours agoIt’s about not giving your opponent any ammunition to discredit your argument.
thisnameisnottolong@piefed.au 18 hours ago
I understand, but that’s not the game here. They will always find a way to discredit the argument. You can keep taking the high road but they are holding you to a standard they only apply to one side of the argument.
Gazans are starving = pre-existing condition, we are providing food, it’s a publicity stunt…
They are targeting journalists/aid workers = they are Hamas, they are harbouring Hamas, they were warned, it was a communication error, it was operator error, it was a malfunction.
But don’t you dare show two satellite images that aren’t from the same time of year, that’s clearly misinformation!
Lumidaub@feddit.org 18 hours ago
Nobody said this was misinformation, they just pointed out how this could be more effective. Gosh.
thisnameisnottolong@piefed.au 17 hours ago
Yes, the date, that’s what’s going to swing their support… Missed opportunity. Gosh.
Carighan@piefed.world 15 hours ago
You are utterly unable to engage with what someone actually says to you, aren't you? Are you actually still reading things, are just living in your own world and replying nilly-willy?
Lumidaub@feddit.org 17 hours ago
Also not what anyone said.