Comment on Ethical alternatives to Spotify
Mihies@programming.dev 9 hours agoIt’s not theft obviously, information can be duplicated infinitely at no cost.
Yes it is cheaply duplicated, but you have no rights to duplicate it when this is not allowed. Do you think artists are not entitled to a wage though? Should the live by the mercy of fans?
interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 8 hours ago
Please understand, I am saying the Intellectual Property regime should be ABOLISHED, I don’t recognizes ANYONE’s right to limit the propagation of human expression in any form. I find this heinous enclosure of culture absolutely intolerable, I think it corrupts art, creates monetary incentive to create art which are always impure and a defilement of the sanctity of art.
I’m not proposing an alternative, I’m not giving you any kind of solution either.
Artists are not “entitled to wages”, the artists should be paid for in advance, in fact all humans should have the essentials of life provided at no cost. I find it obscene that distributors finance and profit art like they do. The financialization of art has been its downfall. This is why our intellectual world is filled with garish slop, pumped full of “integrated artvertising”.
I’m sorry this demolishes the “business model of art” in this corrupt economic system.
But I want you to you, I hate it, I HATE IT ALL !!!