Comment

Nuremberg was after the holocaust. You can’t just skip over the fact that Charlie Kirk has not instigated a holocaust, nor can you assume that he would have. That’s not even a logical fallacy, it’s simply not even true. Accusing me of a logical fallacy is rich in irony. Seriously, it’s so dumb I don’t even know what to say.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Lumisal@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
Stating not breaking laws is equivalent to doing no harm / doing nothing wrong is the logical fallacy, specifically “appeal to law”.

Saying a genocide has to happen in order for someone’s evil to be justified however, is insane. By your logic, attempted murder shouldn’t be a crime either, because no one got liked.

source
- OccamsRazer@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago
  I can’t believe I’m discussing whether or not it is wrong to kill someone for the crimes they may or may not ever commit…
  
  source
  - Lumisal@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago
    Still on that “appeal to law” fallacy huh?
    
    Since apparently you can’t be arsed to look it up, here’s a direct link: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_the_law
    
    source