Microsoft and Sony aren't currently trying to sue other developers into the ground
[citation needed], because given their size this feels more than just unlikely.
Microsoft and Sony aren’t currently trying to sue other developers into the ground. Nintendo is.
Fuck Nintendo and quit licking their boots
Carighan@piefed.world 3 weeks ago
mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Are you literally asking me to provide proof that somwthing isn’t happening?
You can’t prove a negative, dumbass. The onus of proof is on you
Carighan@piefed.world 2 weeks ago
You can't prove a negative
*blinks*
You are calling me the "dumbass", here? 😅 Both logic and philosophy say this perspective is wrong, and also, funnily enough, if this were true (as in, it's not possible to proof a negative assertion in a burden-of-proof scenario) then that very claim could not be proven either? Because "You cannot prove a negative" is, in itself, a negative assertion.
Luckily for us this is of course wrong, and you can prove a negative. Especially in matters of fact, since you could find a list of current filings of Microsoft and hence show that no, of all their ongoing lawsuits, there are none that are targetting developers (which is not the case, it was easy enough to find two cases without digging any deeper).mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
You are calling me the “dumbass”, here? 😅 Both logic and philosophy say this perspective is wrong
If you’ve ever taken a philosophy course you’d know you’re completely full of shit.
Your whole comment belongs on r/okbuddyretard
morphballganon@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
tHiS cOmPaNy Is UsInG tHe LeGaL sYsTeM tO pRoTeCt ThEiR iPs WhAt AsShOlEs ThEiR fAnS mUsT bE bOoTlIcKeRs
Ok buddy
mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Nintendo is suing Palworld over patents they filed AFTER Palworld released, and said patents are so broad that many other games have the same features. Nintendo is the one in the wrong.
Eat my entire ass, bootlicker.