Comment

Comment on A real question about trans athletes and records

FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

First, everybody should take note of the fact that you still haven’t provided a source showing that trans women have any sort of across-the-board competitive advantage over cis women in sport. I can only presume that’s because you don’t have any. Pathetic. Moving on.

Trans women are males. Males have across-the-board competitive advantages over women. This is the entire reason why womens sports exists lol.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Walk_blesseD@piefed.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

Observable characteristics don't determine sex, but this one chromosome that nobody even knew existed seventy years ago and that doesn't actually do a whole lot does

Bro really ate the L on that one 🤣🤣🤣

Cope, seethe, mald ya drongo

source
- FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au ⁨23⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  What a ridiculous thing to say. People have been able to look at another person forever and correctly say what sex they are and be right 99.9999999% of the time. The only times people were wrong were when they had a very specific DSD. Those people are the exception to the rule of being able to tell sex simply by looking.
  
  You’re basically saying that what someone is biologically is irrelevant, what they look like is what determines their sex. That is so incredibly sexist that it’s hard to even believe anyone could believe it, yet here you are.
  
  source