Providing a counterexample to a claim is not whataboutism.
Whataboutism involves derailing a conversation with an ad-hominem to avoid addressing someone’s argument, like what you just did.
Comment on Lemmy be like
kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 days agoIt’s funny watching you AI bros climb over each other to be the first with a what about-ism.
KombatWombat@lemmy.world 4 days ago
kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 days ago
AI use = small dick energy.
occultist8128@infosec.pub 4 days ago
Yeah, go cry about it. People use AI to help themselves while you’re just being technophobic, shouting ‘AI is bad’ without even saying which AI you mean. And you’re doing it on Lemmy, a tiny techno-bubble. Lmao.
kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 days ago
No one is crying here aside some salty bitch of a techno-fetishist acting like his hard-on for environmental destruction and making people dumber is something to be proud of.
occultist8128@infosec.pub 4 days ago
See I get the point of people hating what they call ‘AI’ here, I totally get it but I can’t see people using wrong terms since I know the correct one. The big corpos already misuse the term saying everything they made AI without specifying what kind of AI it is and people here that I assume techie also went to the wrong path (so you guys are the same as those evils, and u fell on the marketing). It’s not about whataboutism — it’s fixing what people always normalize using wrong terms when talking about technical stuff. I don’t care if you still don’t get it tho, I do what I can for saying the truth.