Comment on New idea
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days agothe issue was consent. are you conceding that consent is absurd from something that we cannot communicate with?
Comment on New idea
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days agothe issue was consent. are you conceding that consent is absurd from something that we cannot communicate with?
Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
Animals can communicate with others in their species, meaning that they can obtain and give consent to others of their species. Just because humans cannot communicate with other non-human animals does not mean that the idea of consent is invalid or absurd.
The fact remains: we cannot receive consent from animals should we want to violate their bodily autonomy. It is always morally unjust to do this. The same is true when people neuter or spay their pets. Humans do this for their own benefit, to avoid behaviors in animals that occur if nothing is done, since not doing so would be inconvenient.
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
consent must be informed. animals can’t be informed anymore than a door can.
Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
From humans they can’t. From other animals of their species, yes they can.
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
i don’t think this is proven. can you cite something?
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
at least you are consistent on this point
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
this is a leap of logic.
Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
You are a dumbass that knows nothing about biology.
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
please cite an animal behavior paper that supports your claim
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.