Comment on Uncovering the Deceptive Logic That Exposes Jordan Peterson - YouTube
CybranM@feddit.nu 3 days agothat certain things exist until proven wrong
Mind sharing an example of this? Do you mean dark matter/energy?
Comment on Uncovering the Deceptive Logic That Exposes Jordan Peterson - YouTube
CybranM@feddit.nu 3 days agothat certain things exist until proven wrong
Mind sharing an example of this? Do you mean dark matter/energy?
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
Yes, like ether was kind of a place holder. It goes in and out of favor. I don’t know that much about dark matter but I grew up right next to fermilab. They were successful in their experiments, but that took a bunch of faith that it would work. Same the cern and the hadron collider. Astronomy is probably the biggest area that you have to have faith in, because there aren’t a lot of ways to test it. I suspect that religious people also test their religion in the same way, no matter what they say or do on the outside.
MotoAsh@lemmy.world 2 days ago
No, faith is not involved in science. At all. Jnless you’re a terrible scientist.
The ENTIRE POINT (well, an extremely important axiom of good experimentation) of a good experiment is it has to be falsifiable. Faith means nothing to an experiment. Faith has no home in science. They didn’t have faith that experiments would work. They had proof that experiments would test something that should be falsifiable.
If you run an experiment where the results cannot be proven one way or the other, it is a bad experiment. Period.
Your insistence on wedging the word ‘faith’ in to experimentation is only indicative of your utter lack of understanding of the very core axioms of science itself.
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
Again, big bang theory.
MotoAsh@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Yes, theory. It is NOT scientific fact. It is only supported because there is much evidence to support its occurence, NOT because scientists have “faith” in it. There is DATA behind it.
Also, there is new data that brings its occurence in to (some) question, and scientists are looking in to it, as opposed to idiots who would merely “have faith” that it occurred and not further examine it.
Again, your insistence on using “faith” only proves how little you understand of science or its products.