Comment on Iron
jsomae@lemmy.ml 4 days agoI’m not generally one to advocate for free-market capitalism, but in this case, I think you would need to explain to me why genetic engineering would be withheld from people given that free access would be more profitable.
Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
the cost. everyone gets everything, no stratified application. The only way to keep genetically engineered casts from developing due to this would be if everyone gets it. Similar thing with very advanced automation. Once the technology hits a certain point ownership has to be shifted to the public at large. If some ownership, and others don’t, for whatever reason, these technologies make a gap in power hitherto unknown. If the billionaire class exert outsized influence due to their resources now, then being able to simply decide how genetic engineering is used, or to own the machines that create almost all of our production, they will simply just be the god kings of an advanced tech era.
These types of things need to be completely socialized, no owners, no IP holders, no cost gates, etc.
jsomae@lemmy.ml 4 days ago
Yes, I agree it should definitely be accessible to everyone. Just like any other kind of healthcare is already in my country. As for the cost, one could redirect funds from healthcare toward it. It should save money on healthcare in the long-run.
Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
this is great if the IP holder continues wanting to play ball with socialized medicine
jsomae@lemmy.ml 4 days ago
are you this skeptical every time a new treatment for something comes out?