I find it interesting that their objections are about the evidence used for bans, rather than claiming they were banned in error.
It’s certainly not how I would respond if I were falsely accused of bring a man.
Comment on [deleted]
PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 days agoMore power to you and all, but this sounds like getting mad at the radio DJ. Not everything has to be two-way communication, sometimes it’s fun to watch others’ interactions.
hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 days ago
domdanial@reddthat.com 5 days ago
I wasn’t saying they are wrong, just that the community is getting exactly what it wants. Less contribution and visibility on an already small platform.
I commented on a post about putting lotion in a zip bag, and my comment was about putting mayo in a squeeze bottle. Not exactly gendered discourse.
Kind of like a community that only accepts input from say, black people. A question about favorite pizzas being thrown out because my username doesn’t confirm I’m black, it’s just a little weird.
hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 days ago
I would imagine they had more to go on than just the username. Its a small community, whenever someone joins for the first time the mods check their post history. I imagine they found something.
It is what the community wants. Its a comfy little space for girls to talk about girl stuff! The mods do an effective job maintaining that atmosphere.
bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 days ago
Chat gpt is actually pretty good at it.
sniggleboots@europe.pub 5 days ago
yeah but they picked the shitty radio edit and didn’t even wait to the end to start announcing the next song, they stink!