Comment on robot slurs
Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip 1 day agoYes!!
Exactly!
Ender was set up to show the duality of what we are capable of (the result), but made things ez(ish?) for the cause (high stakes). A few other works “of fiction” (well, basically every sci-fi empire, modeled ofc after non-fiction ones, or even a controlled experiment like in the Rama series) show how are we capable of such duality for much more mondaine causes (petty personal/political/economical interest, even if not really effective or just temporary - one smol personal win over an entire species if practically possible).
But, imho, both is just self-interest (not the unobtainable “objective greater good”), appreciating something when humanity has nothing to wage it against is ez. It just adds to our life experience - much the same way it adds to it to enslave that thing & subject it to horrors beyond imagining for some profit.
Basically Ender looking at it as individual got the best (“most”?) experience he thought he could, didn’t he? (I’m not saying it was premeditated.) All the saving/slaughtering and all the saving. I think the duality (def a real thing ofc) is just the entitlement of wanting everything & on our terms.
Eg. on Earth even in the most oppressive slavery regimes you always find stories of how someone “liked” some slave & gave them a “”“better”“” life.
It is the duality of human nature, but bcs both things sum up better for us - if both isn’t possible we default to the first one (again, on average/historically speaking).
Tl;dr: yes, duality, but I never understood why there is mysticism around it’s existence, it’s just that we want as much things as possible & when pleasurable.
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
I don’t think that… generally, nor specifically in the case of Ender… that it is about wanting to personally have some kind of total spectrum experience of all possible experiences, as some kind of… maximalist sensory/mindstate fetish kind of thing.
There for sure are probably some people like that, but I’d say thats very uncommon.
What I think is more commone is two things:
Despite having base tendencies we often fall back to, humans just vary, significantly, in terms of how they tend to act toward others.
and
People are capable of actual, real world character development, of doing something and thinking it was good at the time… and realize they were wrong, learning, growing, changing, maybe not in totality, but in very significant and impactful ways.
This is not often as common or extreme in the real world as it is in our stories… but that we emphasize this in our stories also means something about us.
It is about a wide spectrum of potential in all humans, not necessarily a single person exhibiting the whole spectrum, not out of some kind of… experiential hedonism.
Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip 17 hours ago
Oh, no, I never meant Ender as about “total experience” or hedonism (that also why I pointed out that it wasn’t premeditated).
Just that the duality is a sort of step-by-step consequence where firstly Ender had/chose one experience & only after that one the other (when presented with the second choice he already “just” had the first experience and wasn’t wishing more of it).
We are made of experience & less of premeditation.
Sorry, I don’t actuality think Ender works as this example, too young & the story/the genocide presented as an too easy choice (and I’m to clumsy with words to express myself properly).
But, with a lot of changes imagine the characters first choice being on the planet to save the eqq queen (as if that was a separate Ender) - the choice between not being destructive & assuring humanity is safe.
And I still agree with everything you wrote abut humans basically, my sub-point was somewhere within that.