Comment on Off topic
N0x0n@lemmy.ml 2 days agoAnother solution would be to add a second audio stream (2.1) and let the viewer choose how to watch their movie.
Comment on Off topic
N0x0n@lemmy.ml 2 days agoAnother solution would be to add a second audio stream (2.1) and let the viewer choose how to watch their movie.
BorgDrone@feddit.nl 2 days ago
Do you also want to add different video streams for smaller TV’s ?
What you want is a made-for-TV adaptation of the same story, but that wouldn’t be the same movie. Watching a movie is an experience, and you simply cannot reproduce experience that on a small TV with 2.0 audio. Even if they did a 2.0 mix, you won’t get the same sense of awe that you get when you watch it in a theater. What is even the point of watching it if you cannot make you feel that?
Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 2 days ago
They already include multiple audio streams for language selection. In fact, watching a movie in a different language than it was originally produced in doesn’t perfectly “reproduce the experience” either. Jokes get cut, names and acronyms change, and cultural references are either altered or become too foreign for the culture of the new audience to instantly recognize.
Offering a different experience of a movie isn’t unusual. Maybe I can’t understand a Miyazaki film to the extent that he fully intended, because I don’t understand Japanese. But that doesn’t mean there’s no point in watching it.
As well, some people don’t want to experience super loud explosions. They’re content not having that aspect of “the experience” for a variety of reasons. Some people have PTSD. Some people have irritable neighbors. Some people suffer from tinnitis and would appreciate not having the rest of the movie drowned out by a loud ringing inside their own heads.
In many ways, a stream without such dynamic noises provides accessibility to people who wouldn’t be able to enjoy the movie otherwise. You can still enjoy a movie however you want. The rest of us just want an option.
BorgDrone@feddit.nl 2 days ago
Don’t me started on that one… it’s a fscking disgrace.
OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
Please don’t provide alternate stream for censored cursing. It’s a disgrace. I want the same sense of awe awe that you get when I hear it in a theater. What is even the point of watching it if it cannot make me feel that?
Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Oof, as an artist myself, I’d be understanding if somebody wanted to tweak something I made in order to make it more accessible.
But you know what? You do you, man. I can tell you’re a person with conviction, and though I disagree with your opinion, I respect your passion for art integrity.
OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
You heard it here guys, enjoying a movie on a normal TV or an iPad is simply wrong and you should feel bad for wanting to be able to understand the dialogue. I guess it makes sense that a BorgDrone would be intolerably inflexible and demand people conform to their unrealistic standards.
BorgDrone@feddit.nl 2 days ago
It’s simply pointless. Like listening to music with your ears plugged. Why even bother watching a movie like that?
Uebercomplicated@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
I’ve literally watched 2001: A Space Odyssey on the plain in mono because my seat’s audio was broken and I was trying to use my IEMs without an adapter. I had a great experience, in part because I love more about the movie than just the visual and auditory delivery. I like the story and philosophy as well.
You may not have enjoyed it in that setting, but please don’t gatekeep the experience. It’s also worth mentioning that a lot for movies are, unlike 2001, not art.
OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
Because I can still enjoy it, regardless of what your standards are.