I think the distinction lies in an assumption you’ve accidentally made. No doxxing may be useful internet social community rule.

But no doxxing ever in other activities, such as where you transact and have a relationship of trust, isn’t a reasonable expectation. There are times you need to know who a person is. Where people experience loss due to a poor product someone has to be answerable.

This case isn’t about online trolling and social media community standards, its about contracting parties for a commercial product.

So i think thats an important distinction between this case and what you’re talking about.