Only countries where the local rich or the government bought up enough that when the real capitol arrived, they said “not for sale”
Oh yeah, and also had a military strong enough to make it too risky to send in the private armies that companies used to have
shneancy@lemmy.world 1 month ago
if the instances stopping some from buying everything up can be bypassed by just having more money then they’re pointless. maybe one guy can’t have so much property, but what about a firm? and then a second firm, so many companies that own so much all owned by one person
beejboytyson@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I was about to say. When was that ever used?
Vinstaal0@feddit.nl 1 month ago
It has taken a while, but now regulating bodies are actually looking at who is the ultimate beneficial owner of a company and they will try and stop overtakes. Well, not in corrupt countries, but it is so hard to get anything properly done in a corrupt country that it doesn’t surprise me.
shneancy@lemmy.world 1 month ago
is there a non-corrupt country out there?
Vinstaal0@feddit.nl 1 month ago
There is a difference between a country being corrupt and a country having corruption or a lot of people in a country paying for corruption (in other countries). You can check the corruption index if you want.