xaetrus@lemmy.world 1 year ago
A soft lifestyle? And to think this whole time I thought it was just called “being poor and underpaid”
xaetrus@lemmy.world 1 year ago
A soft lifestyle? And to think this whole time I thought it was just called “being poor and underpaid”
SCB@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Generally the people being discussed in this article are not poor and underpaid, but rather prefer work-life balance to be heavily slanted toward “life” and “experiences” rather than “work as much as possible to make as much as possible.”
CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 year ago
From the article, buried inside of it…
I know the article insinuates it, but I don’t think we can assume that people can afford more but just don’t want to spend more, to protect their lifestyle.
I believe it’s more of people want a better lifestyle and they’re not getting paid enough for it, that they’re expecting the same lifestyle that the previous generations had, and are not being selfish and asking for more than others had.
randomdeadguy@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Yeah! They should be raising themselves up by pulling up those bootstraps. That’s the way anyone can reach a higher socio-economic status. America!! /s
SCB@lemmy.world 1 year ago
This really has nothing to do with “bootstraps” which is a metaphor about climbing from poverty.