if I was a reviewer I would make them change the terms. they went for eDNA in the soil, but they also called it eDNA when collecting from skin swab, which by definition, isn’t eDNA (unless you’re trying to detect organisms that are in contact with the salamander). they are at best controls or sample confirmations. but I won’t call it eDNA.
However, I’ve had to review papers much worse than this. I’m only arguing semantics here, interesting paper though.
IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 days ago
thanks for the paper.
if I was a reviewer I would make them change the terms. they went for eDNA in the soil, but they also called it eDNA when collecting from skin swab, which by definition, isn’t eDNA (unless you’re trying to detect organisms that are in contact with the salamander). they are at best controls or sample confirmations. but I won’t call it eDNA.
However, I’ve had to review papers much worse than this. I’m only arguing semantics here, interesting paper though.
vivalapivo@lemmy.today 2 days ago
I haven’t been doing biology stuff, but it did remind me of the old good days. Thanks