Should I feel bad if I feel referenced?
Comment on Only thing getting developed is a headache
MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world 8 months agoNow a days it’s:
Open ChatGPT Paste code “Can you just fix this for me?”
Xirup@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 months ago
Contend6248@feddit.de 8 months ago
If that’s literally all you do, then yes. If not, you just know your tools.
Xirup@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 months ago
Not so, I code by myself and when I have a problem I ask ChatGPT but I do not say “do everything for me”
virku@lemmy.world 8 months ago
ChatGPT has taught me so much basic programming I should have learned years ago. Don’t know if I’ll remember any of it since Ill just end up pasting my almost working stuff into ChatGPT again once I’m stuck.
VantaBrandon@lemmy.world 8 months ago
^^^ How skynet was born, ChatGPT injecting subroutines copied by lackadaisical programmers copying and pasting without checking
virku@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Oh I’m reading and making sure I understand everything. I usually write the suggestiona myself to try to get it into my fingers. But it is usually basic stuff I haven’t done very often I struggle with. Like filtrering building a JSON like an object by adding each part step by step and serializing every input properly, instead of just building the JSON string by hand.
ChiefSinner@lemm.ee 8 months ago
Chatgpt is good for code reviews. I wouldn’t trust it for making code though.
pirat@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Are there any other LLMs or co-pilot tools you’d recommend over ChatGPT, or wouldn’t you trust LLMs in general?
As I see it, since we can keep iterating, reviewing, rewriting prompts, and even use tools like autogen to let multiple bots interact to solve a problem on our behalf, your take is somehow only diggin’ the surface.
ChiefSinner@lemm.ee 8 months ago
Mostly, its my own personal choice / preference.
When I see chatgpt spun up code, sometimes its rock solid. Sometimes it uses weird logic that is hard to follow. I prefer it to review my code, rather than review its.
I’m kind of partial to how military concepts use cases for ai. Like anything that can do damage or complex tasks must be done by a human. Mediocre tasks, I can see a use for it.
Like for instance, write a code to automate scheduling a jobs to backup multiple systems using this fileset to backup or skip I’d feel OK to let ai do. They should all be basically the same. But to script code that is critical to infrastructure and/or complex I feel it is not the right tool to use.
KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 8 months ago
In my experience, it tends to have difficulties with restrictions, and will attempt to use the normal method for things no matter what