Comment on The future of warfare is now
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 days agoLol
What is it with the 101st Chairborn and their need to make light of human casualties?
what unreported casualties do you imagine there could even be?
Intelligence on the ground, particularly spotters near the target, would be the most obvious potential liabilities.
But now that Ukraine has bloodied their nose
They’ve been bloodying one another for years on end. This isn’t the first successfully Ukrainian strike since the war started.
Seriously, what do you even want here?
To quite treating this bloodbath as a fucking football game.
Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
I’m not making light of casualties, I’m making light of the baseless claim that there even could be casualties, because I reiterate:
You think if they found spotters deep in Russian territory near their nuclear bombers the operation would have succeeded?
So, you’re not gonna defend the claim that we should worry about retaliation? Just move the conversation elsewhere? This is so incredibly bad faith.
Congratulations, it’s not working. You just sound like a cheerleader yourself.
LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
Don’t bother engaging him. He accidentally let his mask slip in another thread. He’s a Putin apologist trying to “both sides“ the conflict.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 days ago
The cavalier attitude towards death is symptomatic of a deep online mental illness.