Comment on [deleted]
JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 5 days ago
You think pictures of children is porn? If that’s the case, you maybe the one with the problem. There is nothing sexual in the image you linked.
Comment on [deleted]
JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 5 days ago
You think pictures of children is porn? If that’s the case, you maybe the one with the problem. There is nothing sexual in the image you linked.
thermal_shock@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Bullshit that’s not suggestive. That’s like saying when the Nazi bois type “1488”, it doesn’t mean the first 14 letters of the white national phrase and “heil Hitler”. It’s a dog whistle. Nearly all anime is a sexualized cartoon, even when there is no nudity. Downvote me if you want, but I agree with OP, especially when it’s in a sub with other sexualized or R34 crap.
AdamBomb@lemmy.sdf.org 5 days ago
It is 100% suggestive.
I see it’s a popular tactic to accuse the whistleblowers as being the ones with the real problem, which is a bullshit attempt to suppress discourse on the topic. I have another idea: that maybe those who claim that this picture isn’t sexual have been overexposed to much harder child sexual content, and as a result this picture doesn’t register on their radar. Speaking as someone who has not been exposed to any child sexual material, this is immediately, obviously meant to titillate.
thermal_shock@lemmy.world 5 days ago
I reworded mine, I see how you thought I was saying it was not suggestive.