Comment on 10 to 100 Times Faster than a Starlink Antenna, and Cheaper Than Fiber: Taara Unveils a Laser Internet That Could Shatter the Status Quo

<- View Parent
renard_roux@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

Asked cgpt to compare lasers to microwave for data transmission; take with a grain of salt, but seems transfer rate especially isn’t comparable.


🔄 Comparison: Laser vs Microwave Data Transmission

📋 Comparison Table

Feature Laser Transmission (e.g., Taara) Microwave Transmission
Medium Free-space optical (light, like a fiber-optic cable without fiber) Radio/microwave frequencies (GHz range)
Wavelength ~780–1600 nm (near-infrared) ~1–100 GHz
Typical Data Rate 10–100 Gbps (Taara targets ~20 Gbps and higher) 100 Mbps – 1 Gbps (modern line-of-sight microwave)
Max Practical Range ~10–20 km, highly sensitive to weather ~30–50 km, more tolerant of weather
Line-of-Sight Requirement Yes, with tight beam alignment needed Yes, but more forgiving alignment
Weather Sensitivity High — fog, rain, dust degrade performance Moderate — heavy rain can attenuate signal
Latency Low Low
Power Usage Lower power for same data rate Slightly higher power use
Security High — narrow beam, hard to intercept Moderate — wider beam, easier to jam or intercept
Deployment Harder — requires precision mounting and stability Easier — flexible mounting, ruggedized equipment
Cost Higher upfront (optical gear, alignment systems) Lower per-unit, mature market
Use Cases High-throughput backhaul (rural, terrain-constrained areas) Medium-throughput links, often as telco backbone

📌 Key Insights


🧠 When to Use What

Use Laser Links (e.g., Taara) when:

Use Microwave Transmission when:

source
Sort:hotnewtop