Comment on 70% of games that require internet get destroyed
Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 5 days agoYour last sentence is incredibly incorrect. Does exaggeration usually win you arguments where you are from?
Comment on 70% of games that require internet get destroyed
Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 5 days agoYour last sentence is incredibly incorrect. Does exaggeration usually win you arguments where you are from?
samus12345@lemm.ee 4 days ago
Instead of just saying it’s incorrect, say why. I can just as easily say that you’re incorrect.
Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
It doesnt cost them nothing. There.
Adalast@lemmy.world 3 days ago
That is not a rebuttal. A rebuttal requires evidentiary support of your stance. For instance, as support for saying it costs them nothing, one might offer the following:
There, 3 salient points which support the position that releasing the codebase for the game when sunsetting it costs the company nothing. I could even make points about how it is actually profitable for the company, but I want to give you your turn to rebutt me now that you have a good example of how to provide a good argument.
Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
Okay, if the crew was released at EOL, it would have cost ubisoft money on sales of the crew 2. I would not expect them to choose to lose money in that situation. It was only later with multiple issues with multiple games that ubisofts market value tanked and they had to assess a new position/direction for the company.
Also, we are talking about video games, not a basic right like food, water, and air.