Comment on Palworld confirms ‘disappointing’ game changes forced by Pokémon lawsuit
lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 3 weeks agoPretty much anything so long as Palworld doesn’t have 1.- a backbone and 2.- a dictionary at hand. Because it is as simple as finding a picture of any of a long list of animals that can glide, state the words “previous art” and they should be free from this ridiculous demand.
Mechanics that already exist in nature should not be copyrightable. Can you imagine if the first videogame company ever patented “character walking”?
Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 weeks ago
they were pretty much in hotwater for copying pokemons likeness, they probably dint want to have more expensive legal and drawn out fight.