Comment on Not difficult to understand

• mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  maybe ppl just have enough money to survive for a while and dont want to work while they pursue hobbies

  The issue is that this is exactly what employers are trying to avoid. They want a good little worker bee who will show up every day and complete their tasks as assigned for 25 years straight. They don’t want someone who will just randomly decide to quit and focus on their hobbies.

  source

  • 3dmvr@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Because ppl expect/get more benefits and pay overtime

    source
  • 3dmvr@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I thought it was worse to retain ppl long term and thats why they are constsntly firing ppl?

    source

    • b000rg@midwest.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      It’s almost never actually a good business decision in the long-term to lose an employee, unless that employee is actually causing losses. All the layoffs of the past 50ish years from corporate downsizing is thanks to the business philosophy of Jack Welch. When you stop paying a large group of people, it looks good in the next quarterly meeting because you can point at the money you’re saving. The bad part is that now the business A) has lost that productivity, and B) will likely need to spend more money hiring a replacement worker who won’t be as competent.

      source