yeah thats a wild assumption, maybe ppl just have enough money to survive for a while and dont want to work while they pursue hobbies, why is that not allowed, nah mustve been in jail
Comment on Not difficult to understand
kevin2107@lemmy.world 17 hours agoLol who tf actually thinks that. Ive hired and never thought that
3dmvr@lemm.ee 16 hours ago
mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 hours ago
maybe ppl just have enough money to survive for a while and dont want to work while they pursue hobbies
The issue is that this is exactly what employers are trying to avoid. They want a good little worker bee who will show up every day and complete their tasks as assigned for 25 years straight. They don’t want someone who will just randomly decide to quit and focus on their hobbies.
3dmvr@lemm.ee 9 hours ago
Because ppl expect/get more benefits and pay overtime
3dmvr@lemm.ee 9 hours ago
I thought it was worse to retain ppl long term and thats why they are constsntly firing ppl?
b000rg@midwest.social 8 hours ago
It’s almost never actually a good business decision in the long-term to lose an employee, unless that employee is actually causing losses. All the layoffs of the past 50ish years from corporate downsizing is thanks to the business philosophy of Jack Welch. When you stop paying a large group of people, it looks good in the next quarterly meeting because you can point at the money you’re saving. The bad part is that now the business A) has lost that productivity, and B) will likely need to spend more money hiring a replacement worker who won’t be as competent.
propaganja@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
Man, you must live a privileged life if it didn’t even cross your mind that l
kevin2107@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
What if a small gap on their resume means jail?? What the fuck are you on about
propaganja@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
Chill dude. I’m saying that there are jobs that employ pp
kevin2107@lemmy.world 58 minutes ago
Im saying the hiring managers that think that are brain dead