Comment on 100,000 People Are Using a Telegram Bot That Makes AI Cumshot Videos of Anyone
luciole@beehaw.org 2 days agoGenerating nonconsensual sexual videos is not something you think, it’s something you do.
Is drawing someone on paper nude okay? What if it’s hyper realistic? What if it’s just a stick figure with giant breasts added? Is using Photoshop to enhance it okay? All of these things are things we do.
It’s much more nuanced than it seems. Where is the societal line of what’s okay and what isn’t?
Like everyone is familiar with SSC. That’s an ongoing problem and has been since my introduction to BDSM, which was its own personal brand of hell.
Note I didn’t defend anything. Simply asking where the line was. If the line is consent then, does that mean the AI should be banned? What about Photoshop? What about stick figures of people with boobs? How far should we go to make sure it never happens? Should doors be burst down and office drawers be searched? Will you decide?
I think we can all agree that stick figures with breasts are objectively funny.
Remember this thread is about a bot commodifying the production of cumshot videos from any person’s photo. I fail to see any nuance here. There is only one use: generating porn featuring people that don’t want to. Decency rules continues to apply to general use tools as it always did.
masterofn001@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
Are the fantasies in my mind non consensual?