Comment on The inarguable case for banning social media for teens

lena@gregtech.eu ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

• technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  By bringing the violence of the state down upon children.

  source
• BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  The same way Australia is doing it, a big fine for companies that don’t comply and add an age verification process to sites.

  Will it work 100%? No

  Will it work enough? Probably

  source

  • lena@gregtech.eu ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    So people would have to provide an ID to use social media? That seems like a privacy nightmare.

    source

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      That’s the point.

      source
    • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      I mean, Facebook already requires ID in many cases. www.facebook.com/help/159096464162185/

      You’re required to prove your age in a bunch of real life scenarios too, like buying alcohol, tobacco, or a firearm.

      It is a privacy issue, but the question is on the balance is the privacy concern worse than the harms being done by youth on social media?

      Given that there are literally hundreds of university studies showing how bad this shit is for kids, and leaked internal documents from the social media companies themselves, I think it’s the better choice at the moment.

      source
• pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  without it becoming the most broken law.

  source