Good to see that NE actually has the resources to take action in cases like this - they are massively under-resourced.

However, I wonder how much the cost of this to the developer - £14500 - most of which are court costs - is actually a deterrent. That is not a lot for many developments, and I can see that it would be tempting to simply write it off as an acceptable cost.

There was no mention of whether they developer was required, as a result of this judgement, to add the access tiles and replace the felt as the original licence required either.