The reasoning falls for the “appeal to nature” fallacy. Only because in nature no other animal drinks the baby-food of another species, doesn’t follow we shouldn’t do it.
Same would be: “no other animal pumps the dead bodies of other species from the earth to burn them in mini engines to avoid the inconvenience of walking a few miles”
I mean there are other good reasons, but nature is not one of them.
SrTobi@feddit.de 2 years ago
The reasoning falls for the “appeal to nature” fallacy. Only because in nature no other animal drinks the baby-food of another species, doesn’t follow we shouldn’t do it. Same would be: “no other animal pumps the dead bodies of other species from the earth to burn them in mini engines to avoid the inconvenience of walking a few miles” I mean there are other good reasons, but nature is not one of them.
federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 2 years ago
that’s not even true