There’s a reason we have ethical standards when conducting experiments on living creatures. I don’t really feel like that needs to be explained
Comment on good morning bitches
hmonkey@lemy.lol 2 days ago[deleted]
LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
It’s also extra fucked that he essentially experimented on what are now small children’s lives without any concern that it might severely impact them in unforeseen ways, for the rest of their existence. And all for questionable gain because he apparently didn’t really achieve the objective of making them immune to HIV.
TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 days ago
… You’re sweeping thousands of years of technology being considered “playing God” under the rug like that’s not a thing. Even though in this case, the phrase couldn’t get closer to being accurate.
markovs_gun@lemmy.world 2 days ago
The issue is that this guy just kind of did it without going through any of the normal check steps to make sure he was doing it right or there wouldn’t be any unexpected consequences
hmonkey@lemy.lol 2 days ago
groet@feddit.org 2 days ago
No there absolutely is a way without unconsented human experiments. You can go slow and prove every step of your procedure is save (enough) before doing it. That way you dont have to lie to the other people involved.